Building cleaning services, interior · Florida
GCE custodial Whiting Field
Milton, FL · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
GCE custodial Whiting Field runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, interior workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 4.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 1
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares GCE custodial Whiting Field's OSHA Total Case Rate of 3.0 to the Building cleaning services, interior BLS benchmark of 4.5 (66% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
GCE custodial Whiting Field's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.
Where GCE custodial Whiting Field falls in its industry
5,186 Building cleaning services, in establishmentsSafer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.
Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 355 Building cleaning services, in employers in Florida.
Trend analysis for GCE custodial Whiting Field
Between 2023 and 2024, GCE custodial Whiting Field's Total Case Rate improved from 5.9 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 5.9, a spread of 5.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, GCE custodial Whiting Field recorded 1 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 1 injuries shown on this page for GCE custodial Whiting Field are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 561720 - Building cleaning services, interior.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 32,280 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GCE custodial Whiting Field (this establishment) | 2.96 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Janitorial services industry avg | 4.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 561720 |
| Florida state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by GCE custodial Whiting Field to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on GCE custodial Whiting Field's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Building cleaning services, interior peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 66% of the Building cleaning services, interior benchmark, GCE custodial Whiting Field reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Building cleaning services, interior sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is GCE custodial Whiting Field's safety grade?
How many injuries has GCE custodial Whiting Field reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Florida, and by nearby establishments in Milton - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.0)
Similar size (~25 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.