Employer
GCP PAPER USA, INC
Safety Grade
F
Avg TCR
9.9
per 100 workers
Inspections
3
years on record
Toilet paper made from purchased paper · Texas
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

GCP PAPER USA, INC

Open-data reference.

HOUSTON, TX | Toilet paper made from purchased paper

~48 avg employees | 3 years of OSHA data

F
Failing Safety Record
Avg TCR
9.9
per 100 workers/yr
Industry Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
Total Injuries
13
across all years
Fatalities
0
across all years

GCP PAPER USA, INC has an average TCR of 9.9, which is 300% of the industry average (3.3) for Toilet paper made from purchased paper. This is significantly worse than average.

Safety Insights for GCP PAPER USA, INC

GCP PAPER USA, INC operates an establishment with approximately 48 full-time equivalent workers in HOUSTON, TX, classified under the Toilet paper made from purchased paper industry (NAICS 322291). Across 3 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 13 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 9.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.3 for Toilet paper made from purchased paper, GCP PAPER USA, INC's workforce experiences 300% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 3 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating GCP PAPER USA, INC as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from GCP PAPER USA, INC's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 322291 — Toilet paper made from purchased paper.

DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2023)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

7 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 112,589 hours worked = 12.43 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
GCP PAPER USA, INC (this establishment) 9.89 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg
Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 322291
Texas state avg (all industries) 11.19 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by GCP PAPER USA, INC to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.2 12.4 8 0 0
2022 15.5 15.5 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GCP PAPER USA, INC's safety grade?
GCP PAPER USA, INC has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 9.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Toilet paper made from purchased paper.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) — the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year — against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has GCP PAPER USA, INC reported?
GCP PAPER USA, INC has reported 13 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 3 years of OSHA data (2023, 2022, 2021). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial