Commercial building construction general contractors · District of Columbia

GCS, Inc.

Washington, DC · ~45 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GCS, Inc. runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

GCS, Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 99% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GCS, Inc. safety composite

GCS, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

GCS, Inc. injury rate improved

GCS, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO KUSTOM US - 99-32
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KUSTOM US - 99-32 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

GCS, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GCS, Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (99% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GCS, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where GCS, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Commercial building constructi employers in District of Columbia.

GCS, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate GCS, Inc.
GCS, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

GCS, Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2016 5.0 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · DC · Washington

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KUSTOM US - 99-32 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenroy Construction Co. Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONSTRUCTOMICS, LLC 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smoot Construction Company of Washington DC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2904-SAS-DC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nisga'a Data Systems - DC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Library of Congress 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Ridgeview Orchards 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AeroRepair Corp NH 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WVUH Center for Hope and Healing 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Commercial Roofing, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sales & Engineering, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE RVH Trucking LLC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Independence Constructors Corporation 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coreslab Structures (Orlando) Inc. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.