Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · North Carolina

GE Aviation Asheville

Asheville, NC · ~368 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GE Aviation Asheville runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

GE Aviation Asheville: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GE Aviation Asheville safety composite

GE Aviation Asheville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GE Aviation Asheville held a steady TCR band

GE Aviation Asheville's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO Pratt & Whitney Nort…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt & Whitney North Berwick Parts Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GE Aviation Asheville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GE Aviation Asheville averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GE Aviation Asheville TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where GE Aviation Asheville falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in North Carolina.

GE Aviation Asheville (368 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate GE Aviation Asheville
GE Aviation Asheville (368 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

GE Aviation Asheville has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.7 0.5 3 0 0
2017 0.8 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NC · Asheville

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney North Berwick Parts Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Hooksett NH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services Strother KS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHVS International 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morris Jenkins 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJRT Main Office 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plymouth 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE 099 CORP 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Axium Plastics New Albany 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Albany Division 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southside 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland - 302 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Geary Community Hospital - Main Facility 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shriners Hospitals for Children - Headquarters 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-48180056-8119 Exchange Dr-Wc 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-48180053-1 Glazer Way-Wc 368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.