Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Colorado

GE Johnson Construction

Colorado Springs, CO · ~524 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GE Johnson Construction runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

GE Johnson Construction: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GE Johnson Construction safety composite

GE Johnson Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GE Johnson Construction held a steady TCR band

GE Johnson Construction's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.5 in 2019 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #53/148
  • PHOTO Matthews Constructio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~524 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matthews Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

GE Johnson Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GE Johnson Construction averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GE Johnson Construction TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 2.9

Where GE Johnson Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 148 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Colorado.

GE Johnson Construction (524 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate GE Johnson Construction
GE Johnson Construction (524 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

GE Johnson Construction has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.8 8 0 0
2022 1.8 0.8 9 0 0
2019 1.5 0.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CO · Colorado Springs

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matthews Construction Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Environamics-Raleigh 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clark/Sullivan Construction - California 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGI National Constructors, LLC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Airlines - Chicago Base 524 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods Greeley 525 FTE
STATE-SIZE LONG Building Technologies 526 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Central MN Mental Health Center - Northway 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Williamson Roofing Limited Partnership 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sealed Air - PESC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MAN Engines & Components 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #42 524 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayward Ca 524 FTE
NAT-SIZE Core-Mark Sacramento 524 FTE
NAT-SIZE King County Local Services 524 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.