Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing · Ohio

Gem City Metal Technologies

Dayton, OH · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gem City Metal Technologies runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Gem City Metal Technologies: 7.6 TCR = 232% of Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gem City Metal Technologies safety composite

Gem City Metal Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

Gem City Metal Technologies injury rate improved

Gem City Metal Technologies's TCR fell 0.7 from 8.7 in 2016 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=15.0 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 232% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #72/80
  • PHOTO Cotterman Company - …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cotterman Company - California Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Gem City Metal Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gem City Metal Technologies averages 7.6 TCR (232% of the Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gem City Metal Technologies TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=15 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=8 · BLS 3.3

Where Gem City Metal Technologies falls in its industry

827 Tubing, flexible metal, manufa establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 80 Tubing, flexible metal, manufa employers in Ohio.

Gem City Metal Technologies (39 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gem City Metal Technologies
Gem City Metal Technologies (39 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Gem City Metal Technologies has fewer employees than the Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 6.0 4 0 0
2023 7.3 0.0 3 0 0
2022 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2019 7.3 7.3 3 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2017 15.0 5.0 6 0 0
2016 8.7 8.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · OH · Dayton

827 Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cotterman Company - California Division 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CES-Phoenix 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advex Corporation 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aluminum Fabrication Corporation 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Nansemond Pre-Cast Concrete Co., Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nvlas - Las Vegas North 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Oksha - Shawnee 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sdhur - Huron 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE EMS-Pillars White Bear Lakes 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loveland Co Sales Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Ridge 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE FV Clinics-Hugo Victor 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.