Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic Powder Application and Recovery Equipment · Indiana

Gema USA Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gema USA Inc. runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic Powder Application and Recovery Equipment workplace, earning a grade A.

Gema USA Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic Powder Application and Recovery Equipment BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gema USA Inc. safety composite

Gema USA Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gema USA Inc.: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 4.49× in 2024

Gema USA Inc.'s TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333248 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Eclipse Automation S…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eclipse Automation Southeast (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Gema USA Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gema USA Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic Powder Application and Recovery Equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gema USA Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Gema USA Inc. falls in its industry

55 Manufacture and Sales of Elect establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Manufacture and Sales of Elect employers in Indiana.

Gema USA Inc. (38 employees, TCR 0.5) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 28 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gema USA Inc.
Gema USA Inc. (38 employees, TCR 0.5) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Gema USA Inc. has fewer employees than the Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic P median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333248 · IN · Indianapolis

55 Manufacture and Sales of Electrostatic Powder Application and Recovery Equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eclipse Automation Southeast 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SGL CARBON Technic LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMP Robotics - Colorado Headquarters/P1 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABEC Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenleaf Holdco LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Poultry Services, MPS Egg Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yale Corteva 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marion Svc Ctr Bldg 1 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Midtown Business Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 207 Caterpillar Tech Center Mossville IL 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Metal products, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westbrook 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meter Shop 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utility Service Co Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mineola 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.