Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability · Ohio

Genacross - Family and Youth Services

Toledo, OH · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Genacross - Family and Youth Services runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Genacross - Family and Youth Services: 9.2 TCR = 242% of Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Genacross - Family and Youth Services safety composite

Genacross - Family and Youth Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2018

Genacross - Family and Youth Services injury rate improved

Genacross - Family and Youth Services's TCR fell 1.6 from 9.4 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Toledo, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 242% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #123/155
  • PHOTO Lifekeepers, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lifekeepers, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Genacross - Family and Youth Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Genacross - Family and Youth Services averages 9.2 TCR (242% of the Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Genacross - Family and Youth Services TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Genacross - Family and Youth Services falls in its industry

2,261 Homes with or without health c establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 155 Homes with or without health c employers in Ohio.

Genacross - Family and Youth Services (173 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Genacross - Family and Youth Services
Genacross - Family and Youth Services (173 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Genacross - Family and Youth Services has more employees than the Homes with or without health care, intel median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.8 6.1 14 0 0
2017 10.4 6.9 18 0 0
2016 9.4 7.1 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · OH · Toledo

2,261 Homes with or without health care, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 551 employers in Toledo, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lifekeepers, Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 14th Avenue 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mcgovern lane 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillsborough 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelly Northwest construction 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weidmann Electrical Technology Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArcelorMittal Warren (EIN 043634649) 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Assembly Complex 5,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toledo Hospital 5,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Promedica Downtown Headquarters 3,308 FTE
NAT-TCR Schumacher Electric Corporation - Hoopeston 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Temtco CIL 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 037 ABC Supply Co., Inc 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ka 'Eo Kai Resort 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Health - Jacksonville 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Lighthouse 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiawatha (Iahia) 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paducah (Kypad) 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.