Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) · Florida

General Asphalt-1-

Miami, FL · ~236 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Asphalt-1- runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) workplace, earning a grade B.

General Asphalt-1-: 2.0 TCR = 72% of Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Asphalt-1- safety composite

General Asphalt-1- scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

General Asphalt-1- injury rate improved

General Asphalt-1-'s TCR fell 2.0 from 3.8 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Miami, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #52/174
  • PHOTO APAC-Central Johnso…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: APAC-Central Johnson Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

General Asphalt-1- in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Asphalt-1- averages 2.0 TCR (72% of the Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Asphalt-1- TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where General Asphalt-1- falls in its industry

4,078 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 174 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, employers in Florida.

General Asphalt-1- (236 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate General Asphalt-1-
General Asphalt-1- (236 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

General Asphalt-1- has more employees than the Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, str median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.9 6 0 0
2023 0.7 0.3 1 1 0
2022 2.7 2.7 8 0 0
2021 0.5 0.2 6 6 0
2020 2.2 2.2 7 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 7 0 0
2018 2.5 2.2 7 1 1
2017 3.8 2.1 4 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · FL · Miami

4,078 Asphalt paving (i.e., highway, road, street, public sidewalk) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR APAC-Central Johnson Shop 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR All States Construction, Inc. Sunderland 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction - Paving 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1601 - Columbus, OH 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Orlando 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Florida 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tampa 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ranger Construction_Winter Garden 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR GWS Contractors 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westroc Trucking 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinic-College Station Region 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manke Lumber Company Inc. - Tacoma 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Families First 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairborn OH 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Retail Construction Inc. 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.