Aerospace research and development (except prototype production) · California

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore

Livermore, CA · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aerospace research and development (except prototype production) workplace, earning a grade F.

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore: 1.6 TCR = 314% of Aerospace research and development (except prototype production) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore safety composite

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2023→2024

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore injury rate improved

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541715 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.6 · 314% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO NA-US-CA-Fremont-477…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-CA-Fremont-47700 Kato Road (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Atomics - LLNL Livermore averages 1.6 TCR (314% of the Aerospace research and development (except prototype production) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore TCR series: 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where General Atomics - LLNL Livermore falls in its industry

47 Aerospace research and develop establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Aerospace research and develop employers in California.

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,00020,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate General Atomics - LLNL Livermore
General Atomics - LLNL Livermore (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9

General Atomics - LLNL Livermore has fewer employees than the Aerospace research and development (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541715 · CA · Livermore

47 Aerospace research and development (except prototype production) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fremont-47700 Kato Road 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical East 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Sorrento Valley 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-TX-Hutto-200 County Rd 199 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR STR0688 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Environmental Science International, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health PR 218 Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Noble Trucking LLC. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bhsen-Frmc1-Bhealth-Seneca County 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Property, LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ag Partners Coop - Hiawatha 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0108 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.