Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant)

Peninsula, OH · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant): 7.6 TCR = 231% of Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) safety composite

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant): 0.0 → 17.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2022

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant)'s TCR rose 17.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 17.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331523 · Peninsula, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 231% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #17/21
  • PHOTO CALIFORNIA DIE CASTI…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CALIFORNIA DIE CASTING, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) averages 7.6 TCR (231% of the Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=17.9 · BLS 3.3

Where General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) falls in its industry

221 Zinc die-castings, unfinished, establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 21 Zinc die-castings, unfinished, employers in Ohio.

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) (23 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant)
General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) (23 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7

General Die Caster, Inc (Peninsula Plant) has fewer employees than the Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.9 6.0 3 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331523 · OH · Peninsula

221 Zinc die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 10 employers in Peninsula, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CALIFORNIA DIE CASTING, INC. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnesium Prod of AM 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grafton Division 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TST, Inc. 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE MID EAST PRODUCTION LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlessman Seed Co 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCN Holdings Inc dba Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wayside Farm Inc. 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suncrest Gardens 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilot Plastics 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Elastomer 46 FTE
NAT-TCR Flvle - Jacksonville Hib 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-01789 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0025-0025-02255 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 450120-Aiken Po 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triad Metals International Indiana 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greensboro Terminix 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dragoon Brewing Company 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE YMCA Prince George's County 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.