Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing · Puerto Rico

General Electric of PR LLC

Anasco, PR · ~164 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Electric of PR LLC runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

General Electric of PR LLC: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Electric of PR LLC safety composite

General Electric of PR LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

General Electric of PR LLC held a steady TCR band

General Electric of PR LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335313 · Anasco, PR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Schneider Electric -…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schneider Electric - Fairfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

General Electric of PR LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Electric of PR LLC averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Electric of PR LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where General Electric of PR LLC falls in its industry

226 Generator control and metering establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Generator control and metering employers in Puerto Rico.

General Electric of PR LLC (164 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate General Electric of PR LLC
General Electric of PR LLC (164 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9

General Electric of PR LLC has more employees than the Generator control and metering panels, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335313 · PR · Anasco

226 Generator control and metering panels, switchgear-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 12 employers in Anasco, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schneider Electric - Fairfield 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ControlTech Automation - STL 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARECIBO PR 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell Industries - Airport 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MM Packaging PR - Guaynabo 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caribbean Produce Exchange 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prime Health Services, Inc. 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE GENERA SAN JUAN 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMO Manufacturing INC 1,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMO Puerto Rico Manurfacturing, Inc. 1,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMO Puerto Rico Manufacturing, Inc 1,246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences Technology Sarl 931 FTE
NAT-TCR NAS-National Aerospace Solutions at AEDC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1160-BASF Port Arthur 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dechra Veterinary Products 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EMD Performance Materials Corp. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Woodlands Specialty Hospital 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pines Of Rutland 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZFRI 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health Moberly, MO 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.