Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices · Pennsylvania

General Office, US

Pittsburgh, PA · ~1,018 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Office, US runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices workplace, earning a grade A.

General Office, US: 0.0 TCR = 4% of Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS 0.7 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Office, US safety composite

General Office, US scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

General Office, US held a steady TCR band

General Office, US's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.0 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/63
  • PHOTO UTAH CENTER
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~1,018 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UTAH CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

General Office, US in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Office, US averages 0.0 TCR (4% of the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Office, US TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.7

Where General Office, US falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 63 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Reg employers in Pennsylvania.

General Office, US (1,018 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate General Office, US
General Office, US (1,018 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

General Office, US has more employees than the Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Mana median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · PA · Pittsburgh

1,475 Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UTAH CENTER 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Houston Corporate Office 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4th & Main 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Optimist Hall 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHILADELPHIA NDC_1436570 1,017 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrah's Philadelphia Casino Racetrack 1,017 FTE
STATE-SIZE Organon, LLC Plymouth Meeting Office 1,021 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nazareth Hospital-MHS-PA 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Service Center Operations : 607 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City Headquarters 1KC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-50C8537 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint Anthony Hospital 1,018 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maxton 1,019 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamul Casino 1,017 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.