Installing and servicing electrical wiring and equipment. · Georgia

General Services Group

Carrollton, GA · ~41 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Services Group runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Installing and servicing electrical wiring and equipment. workplace, earning a grade A.

General Services Group: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Installing and servicing electrical wiring and equipment. BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Services Group safety composite

General Services Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Services Group: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

General Services Group's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Carrollton, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/131
  • PHOTO Interstates/Harbor
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Interstates/Harbor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

General Services Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Services Group averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Installing and servicing electrical wiring and equipment. BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Services Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where General Services Group falls in its industry

4,550 Installing and servicing elect establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 131 Installing and servicing elect employers in Georgia.

General Services Group (41 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate General Services Group
General Services Group (41 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

General Services Group has fewer employees than the Installing and servicing electrical wiri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · GA · Carrollton

4,550 Installing and servicing electrical wiring and equipment. employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 93 employers in Carrollton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Interstates/Harbor 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vos Electric, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MMR Constructors, Inc.- Oklahoma Operations 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR A & H Electric Co., LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Classic Groundcovers, Inc 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Shady Dale, GA 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sol America Energy 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocmulgee Electric Membership Corporation 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center/Carrollton 2,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tanner Medical Center / Carrollton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decostar 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 847 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakeview Precision Machining, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem District Complex 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boulder Campus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Spokane_Potelco 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anthem Memory Care 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Norwich: City Hall 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPT - Moreno Valley 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ampjack01 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.