Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Georgia

General Shale Rome

Rome, GA · ~94 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Shale Rome runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

General Shale Rome: 2.9 TCR = 89% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Shale Rome safety composite

General Shale Rome scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Shale Rome: 1.1 → 17582.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17582.4 TCR · DART/TCR 3737.76× in 2024

General Shale Rome's TCR rose 17581.3 from 1.1 in 2016 to 17582.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3737.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Rome, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 89% of ind

  • DART 10989.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Meridian Brick-Miner…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meridian Brick-Mineral Wells West-Meridian (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

General Shale Rome in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Shale Rome averages 2.9 TCR (89% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Shale Rome TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=17582.4 · BLS 3.3

Where General Shale Rome falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Georgia.

General Shale Rome (94 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate General Shale Rome
General Shale Rome (94 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

General Shale Rome has more employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17582.4 10989.0 8 0 0
2023 3.9 1.9 4 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2021 6.5 6.5 6 1 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 4.8 3.8 5 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · GA · Rome

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 147 employers in Rome, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meridian Brick-Mineral Wells West-Meridian 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Pressed Brick & Tile CO 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interstate Brick 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brickcraft 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ace Electric Inc. Statesboro 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Double P Grading Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mana Nutrition 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTERFACE FLOR LLC Graham Scott Technical Center 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROME 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center 3,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Medical Center 2,748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd Healthcare Management Inc 2,741 FTE
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Boyertown 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vincennes Save-A-Lot 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Defense Services, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Paducah 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oakridge Gardens Nursing Center, Inc 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE AGM-Indianapolis 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. P. Mascaro & Sons 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rumpke Sanitary Landfill 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.