Fire sprinkler system installation · California

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc

Orange, CA · ~193 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade D.

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc: 4.4 TCR = 158% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc safety composite

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc: 5.1 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc's TCR rose 0.6 from 5.1 in 2019 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Orange, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 158% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #333/594
  • PHOTO Gross Plumbing Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gross Plumbing Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Underground Fire Protection, Inc averages 4.4 TCR (158% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc TCR series: 2019=5.1 · 2021=6.7 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 2.8

Where General Underground Fire Protection, Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #333 safest of 594 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in California.

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc (193 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate General Underground Fire Protection, Inc
General Underground Fire Protection, Inc (193 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

General Underground Fire Protection, Inc has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.6 11 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 5 0 0
2021 6.7 5.0 12 0 0
2019 5.1 2.0 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Orange

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 319 employers in Orange, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gross Plumbing Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WFS WEST PALM BEACH 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triangle Refrigeration Co. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.A. Comunale, Philadelphia 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Chiala Farms - Hollister 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primavera Ag Services 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Covina S/C 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Maintenance 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine Health 6,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC - CHildren's Hospital of Orange County 4,962 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange 3,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange V2 3,652 FTE
NAT-TCR Del Monte Foods Plover 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GTS Kent 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cowtown Garden Acres Drive 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Window of Lexington 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leware Construction Company of FLorida, Inc. 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Careone at Wayne 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahr Inc. 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaCygne Energy Center 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.