Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Pennsylvania

Generation Maintenance

Name: Generation Maintenance Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Canonsburg, PA · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 1.2
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Generation Maintenance runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Generation Maintenance: 1.2 TCR = 99% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Generation Maintenance safety composite

Generation Maintenance scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Generation Maintenance: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2017

Generation Maintenance's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Canonsburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 99% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK #22/46
PHOTO 00106 YREKA OFFICE
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00106 YREKA OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.2
00106 YREKA OF

1.2
Walter Scott E

1.2
Big Rivers Ele

1.2
Lackawanna Ene

1.2

What this shows Generation Maintenance averages 1.2 TCR (99% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Generation Maintenance TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Generation Maintenance falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 46 Electric power generation, fos employers in Pennsylvania.

Generation Maintenance (76 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Generation Maintenance has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	2.4	1.2	2	0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · Canonsburg

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 63 employers in Canonsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	00106 YREKA OFFICE	YREKA, CA	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Walter Scott Energy Center	COUNCIL BLUFFS, IA	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Big Rivers Electric Corporation - Wilson Station	CENTERTOWN, KY	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Lackawanna Energy Center	JESUP, PA	1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Horsham Office	HORSHAM	76 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Frank J. Zottola Construction	BUTLER	76 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LB Foster Rail Technologies, Inc (Field Services)	PITTSBURGH	76 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Arch Masonry Inc.	PITTSBURGH	76 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SSSI, Inc. dba Songer Services	Canonsburg	780 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Arc Human Services	Canonsburg	650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lighthouse Electric Company, Inc.	Canonsburg	616 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Starline Holdings,LLC	Canonsburg	516 FTE
NAT-TCR	Legends - Sugar Land Skeeters	Sugar Land, TX	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	MS - Indian Springs, NV - 5ISNV	Indian Springs, NV	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Phelps	Dalton, GA	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	MCCOMB	Magnolia, MS	1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Praxair Surface Technologies, Inc. TAFA Division	Concord, NH	76 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Mexico LLC	Mexico, MO	76 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Brookhaven LLC	Springfield, MO	76 FTE
NAT-SIZE	PolyOne Corporation Kennesaw	Kennesaw, GA	76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.