Crude Oil Transmission and Storage · Louisiana

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal

Baton Rouge, LA · ~17 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Crude Oil Transmission and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Crude Oil Transmission and Storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal safety composite

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal held a steady TCR band

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/15
  • PHOTO 1000 Campus Dr, Coll…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1000 Campus Dr, Collegeville, PA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Crude Oil Transmission and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal falls in its industry

453 Crude Oil Transmission and Sto establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 15 Crude Oil Transmission and Sto employers in Louisiana.

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal (17 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal
Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal (17 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Genesis Energy,Port of Baton Rouge Terminal has fewer employees than the Crude Oil Transmission and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · LA · Baton Rouge

453 Crude Oil Transmission and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1000 Campus Dr, Collegeville, PA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations - New Orleans 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron 4800 W Greens Rd 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 128 - ASHLAND DC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE G & D Well Service, Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turbo Chem International, Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABITA SPRINGS 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnny's Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR Lawrenceburg 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecker Textiles, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Electric Corp 0.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.