Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Colorado

Genesis Plastics Technologies

Greeley, CO · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Genesis Plastics Technologies runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Genesis Plastics Technologies: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Genesis Plastics Technologies safety composite

Genesis Plastics Technologies scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2022

Genesis Plastics Technologies injury rate improved

Genesis Plastics Technologies's TCR fell 6.7 from 6.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Greeley, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Champion Window of C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Champion Window of Chattanooga (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Genesis Plastics Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Genesis Plastics Technologies averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Genesis Plastics Technologies TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Genesis Plastics Technologies falls in its industry

202 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manuf establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manuf employers in Colorado.

Genesis Plastics Technologies (38 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Genesis Plastics Technologies
Genesis Plastics Technologies (38 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Genesis Plastics Technologies has fewer employees than the Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 12.9 7.7 4 1 0
2017 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.7 6.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · CO · Greeley

202 Tube, nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 178 employers in Greeley, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Champion Window of Chattanooga 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VEKA East 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VPI Sheboygan 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Profile Plastics, Inc 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE COLORADO PRODUCTION FARMING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nathan Naill, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan County Rural Electric Association 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thrive Home Builders Corporate Office 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREELEY CO 2,744 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wood Group USA Inc., Pipeline Services, Service Area 868 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jomax Construction Co., Inc. 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leprino Foods 527 FTE
NAT-TCR Tops #220 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Reichhold Pensacola 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartford Health Care 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Onward Manufacturing Company 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Krieghoff-Lenawee 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE JG Development 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Sleep Products 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE HeatherWood Assisted Living & Memory Care 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.