Medical care management services · California

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center

Martinez, CA · ~56 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Medical care management services workplace, earning a grade A.

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center: 1.5 TCR = 38% of Medical care management services BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center safety composite

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center held a steady TCR band

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Martinez, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/116
  • PHOTO 1855-FLJAC48
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1855-FLJAC48 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center averages 1.5 TCR (38% of the Medical care management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center falls in its industry

461 Medical care management servic establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 116 Medical care management servic employers in California.

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (56 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center
George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (56 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center has fewer employees than the Medical care management services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · CA · Martinez

461 Medical care management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 72 employers in Martinez, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1855-FLJAC48 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Private Care 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CentralPark 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Methodist Hospital of Sacramento EM 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 58 2,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR Contra Costa Regional Medical Center 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Martinez Refinery 740 FTE
CITY-NEAR Contra Costa Electric, Inc. 619 FTE
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Kettering 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vallourec Tube Alloy Richey 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR T&W Tire Fort Worth 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Optima Foods Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HDA1 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bargreen Ellingson Portland 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuhn Employment Opportunities, Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coral Reef Management 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.