HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Arizona

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating

Phoenix, AZ · ~153 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating runs at 403% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating: 11.3 TCR = 403% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating safety composite

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2021

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating injury rate improved

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating's TCR fell 2.9 from 14.0 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.0 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 403% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #112/131
  • PHOTO Harry E. Nason Inc. …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harry E. Nason Inc. dba Nason Mechanical Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating averages 11.3 TCR (403% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating TCR series: 2016=14 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=11.1 · BLS 2.8

Where George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 131 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Arizona.

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating (153 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating
George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating (153 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

George Brazil Air Conditioning & Heating has more employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.1 7.0 17 2 0
2020 8.7 4.0 10 3 0
2016 14.0 10.9 17 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · AZ · Phoenix

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harry E. Nason Inc. dba Nason Mechanical Systems 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLAXO SMITH KLINE SWEDELAND 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PlumbWorks 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2681_5131 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lone Cactus Egg Farm 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Icon Protection Surprise 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIVERSAL WALLBOARD CORP. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Underground Construction 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR MIA Miami - 7300 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Neon Zone Inc /dba NZI Services 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aluminum Precision Products Oxnard 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sby 84 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SAS Services Las Vegas, Inc 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE SageNet - Tulsa 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Ledyard - 0680 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vmc - Fort Scott 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.