Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · Arkansas

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant

Springdale, AR · ~814 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade C.

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant safety composite

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant: 3.1 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2019

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant's TCR rose 0.7 from 3.1 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Springdale, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #27/69
  • PHOTO Claxton Poultry Farms
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~814 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Claxton Poultry Farms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows George's Springdale Further Processing Plant averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where George's Springdale Further Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 69 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Arkansas.

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant (814 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate George's Springdale Further Processing Plant
George's Springdale Further Processing Plant (814 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

George's Springdale Further Processing Plant has more employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.7 1.9 27 6 0
2018 2.2 1.3 19 0 0
2017 2.2 1.1 15 2 0
2016 3.1 1.4 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · AR · Springdale

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 191 employers in Springdale, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Claxton Poultry Farms 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt Vernon Distribution Center 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fieldale Farms - Murrayville Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butterball LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6018 817 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Medical Center- Sprindale 817 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6082 808 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springdale Processing 7,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR Further Processing 5,981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Street Plant 1,224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springdale AR Terminal 1,221 FTE
NAT-TCR McGregor Industries, Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Holdings 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Livonia - CR 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 0786 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Ag. Inc. 814 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCFA 814 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCVHHS, Behavorial Health Services (415) 814 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capacity LLC - New Jersey Campus 814 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.