Electric power control · Georgia

Georgia System Operations Corporation

Tucker, GA · ~259 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Georgia System Operations Corporation runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power control workplace, earning a grade A.

Georgia System Operations Corporation: 0.3 TCR = 21% of Electric power control BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Georgia System Operations Corporation safety composite

Georgia System Operations Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2020→2024

Georgia System Operations Corporation injury rate improved

Georgia System Operations Corporation's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Tucker, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Basin Electric Power…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Headquarters Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Georgia System Operations Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Georgia System Operations Corporation averages 0.3 TCR (21% of the Electric power control BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Georgia System Operations Corporation TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Georgia System Operations Corporation falls in its industry

263 Electric power control establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Electric power control employers in Georgia.

Georgia System Operations Corporation (259 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Georgia System Operations Corporation
Georgia System Operations Corporation (259 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Georgia System Operations Corporation has more employees than the Electric power control median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · GA · Tucker

263 Electric power control employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 132 employers in Tucker, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Headquarters Office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIND ENERGY TRANSMISSION TEXAS LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR John W Vaughan Transmission Building 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broward Service Center 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nourison Industries 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boehringer-Ingelheim 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freudenberg-NOK LaGrange 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micromeritics Norcross 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Plant Services, LLC (All Locations) 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE
NAT-TCR 170 Data Drive Work Location-MAAV 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Innova Electronics Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caltrol, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LeChase Construction Services, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Castle Park 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Airways Corporation 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE O.C. Seacrets, Inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE FV Medical Transportation 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.