Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing · Texas

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill

Midlothian, TX · ~2,921 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill safety composite

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill held a steady TCR band

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Midlothian, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #11/28
  • PHOTO Clairton Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~2,921 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clairton Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill falls in its industry

416 Electrometallurgical steel man establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 28 Electrometallurgical steel man employers in Texas.

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill (2,921 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill
Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill (2,921 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Gerdau North America Steel Midlothian Mill has more employees than the Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.9 0.5 17 2 0
2018 1.5 0.4 14 1 0
2017 3.3 3.0 26 5 0
2016 1.8 0.8 15 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · TX · Midlothian

416 Electrometallurgical steel manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 52 employers in Midlothian, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clairton Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Offshore Operations Houston 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charter Steel - Fostoria 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferroglobe Bridgeport Alabama 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW6 2,948 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0284-HES Sam Houston Pkwy CorpBldg J 2,948 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guckenheimer Services, LLC 2,970 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&P U.S. Land - West 2,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3801 - Midlothian DC 1,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3801 - Midlothian TX DC 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerdau Midlothian 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Midlothian Medical Center 413 FTE
NAT-TCR GSM Janesville Location 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenai_Homer 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Systems Germantown 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Okaloosa Medical Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL7 2,921 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adena Regional Medical Center 2,921 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND1 2,922 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dsi Security Services Corporate 2,918 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.