Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · South Carolina

Giant Resource Recovery

Sumter, SC · ~76 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Giant Resource Recovery runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade A.

Giant Resource Recovery: 1.2 TCR = 47% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Giant Resource Recovery safety composite

Giant Resource Recovery scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2019

Giant Resource Recovery injury rate improved

Giant Resource Recovery's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Sumter, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Clean Harbors Deer T…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clean Harbors Deer Trail LLC 68DR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Giant Resource Recovery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Giant Resource Recovery averages 1.2 TCR (47% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Giant Resource Recovery TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Giant Resource Recovery falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Hazardous waste treatment faci employers in South Carolina.

Giant Resource Recovery (76 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Giant Resource Recovery
Giant Resource Recovery (76 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Giant Resource Recovery has more employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 1.2 1 1 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · SC · Sumter

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Deer Trail LLC 68DR 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACT Treatment 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate & Field Service 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waste Control Specialists LLC 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc Fiber Industries 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper Eastover 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE C, R, Hipp Construction Inc 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belton Industries, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR AUSTTX02 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HP - CA (San Bernardino) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Electrolux - CA 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stafek and Son Trucking Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Volvo Logistics Elkridge 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis IND 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE York Mac YRK 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behavioral Heath Works, San Diego, Inc 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.