Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard · North Carolina

Gibraltar Packaging Group

Mount Gilead, NC · ~76 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gibraltar Packaging Group runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Gibraltar Packaging Group: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gibraltar Packaging Group safety composite

Gibraltar Packaging Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Gibraltar Packaging Group injury rate improved

Gibraltar Packaging Group's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Mount Gilead, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO Shelbyville IL
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shelbyville IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gibraltar Packaging Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gibraltar Packaging Group averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gibraltar Packaging Group TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gibraltar Packaging Group falls in its industry

205 Cartons, folding (except milk) establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Cartons, folding (except milk) employers in North Carolina.

Gibraltar Packaging Group (76 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gibraltar Packaging Group
Gibraltar Packaging Group (76 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Gibraltar Packaging Group has fewer employees than the Cartons, folding (except milk), made fro median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · NC · Mount Gilead

205 Cartons, folding (except milk), made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Mount Gilead, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shelbyville IL 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ft Smith AR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conductive Containers 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conway Folding 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CTC - CTN 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pro-Tops Inc 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction Co. - Charlotte Region 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sammax Contracting, LLC 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jordan Lumber & Supply Inc 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR McRae Footwear Hwy 109 N 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR McRae Footwear Division- Wadeville 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR McRae Footwear Division Troy 146 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Gas and Supply Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Enhanced Environmental and Emergency Services 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Empire Truck Sales - Biloxi 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sand Mountain Electric Cooperative 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valk Manufacturing Company 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas J. Feeney Enterprises 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rolling Green Village 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.