Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Indiana

Gibson Generating Station

Owensville, IN · ~357 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gibson Generating Station runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Gibson Generating Station: 0.4 TCR = 35% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gibson Generating Station safety composite

Gibson Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gibson Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Gibson Generating Station's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.2 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Owensville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/18
  • PHOTO Supply Support
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supply Support (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Gibson Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gibson Generating Station averages 0.4 TCR (35% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gibson Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Gibson Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 18 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Indiana.

Gibson Generating Station (357 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gibson Generating Station
Gibson Generating Station (357 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Gibson Generating Station has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2019 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2018 0.8 0.4 4 0 0
2017 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2016 0.2 0.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · IN · Owensville

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 8 employers in Owensville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supply Support 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLOVER PWR STA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otay Mesa Energy Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCI Frankfort IN 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1557 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1655 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Owensville 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Duke Energy-Owensville 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR RK Transport Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Commercial Mowing, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Ballad Health 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Goshawk 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SM Electric 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Estates at Fridley 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boutwells Landing 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando Construction Division 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Palatine 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-Core of New Mexico 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.