Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Gilman Park Assisted Living

Oregon City, OR · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gilman Park Assisted Living runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Gilman Park Assisted Living: 12.3 TCR = 323% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gilman Park Assisted Living safety composite

Gilman Park Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.0

2016→2022

Gilman Park Assisted Living injury rate improved

Gilman Park Assisted Living's TCR fell 20.0 from 25.0 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 25.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.0 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=17.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=14.0 · 2022=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Oregon City, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 323% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #143/218
  • PHOTO Lewiston Senior Living
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lewiston Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Gilman Park Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gilman Park Assisted Living averages 12.3 TCR (323% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gilman Park Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=25 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=17.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=14 · 2022=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Gilman Park Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Gilman Park Assisted Living (57 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gilman Park Assisted Living
Gilman Park Assisted Living (57 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gilman Park Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2021 14.0 10.0 7 0 0
2020 10.6 4.2 5 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2018 17.5 0.0 7 0 0
2017 9.3 9.3 4 0 0
2016 25.0 10.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Oregon City

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 64 employers in Oregon City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lewiston Senior Living 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Clearwater Springs, LLC 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vineyard FG MC Care Properties, LLC 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imboden Creek Gardens Assisted Living 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kuenzi Turf & Nursery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R King Logging Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pavilion Construction NW 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Northwest Gutters 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas County 2,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas Community College 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR278 PROVIDENCE WILLAMETTE FALLS MEDICAL CTR 752 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00242 384 FTE
NAT-TCR 387875-Springfield Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 410836-Braddock Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 354180-Jamestown Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Northside ARC 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Whse 548 - Marlay 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal CT -Mount Airy CT 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-CA180 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Michigan Lumber 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.