Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Indiana

Girtz Industries, Inc.

Monticello, IN · ~133 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Girtz Industries, Inc. runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Girtz Industries, Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Girtz Industries, Inc. safety composite

Girtz Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Girtz Industries, Inc.: 4.2 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2024

Girtz Industries, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 4.2 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Monticello, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #23/35
  • PHOTO Shaffer Metal Fab, I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 58 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shaffer Metal Fab, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Girtz Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Girtz Industries, Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Girtz Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=5 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Girtz Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 35 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Indiana.

Girtz Industries, Inc. (133 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Girtz Industries, Inc.
Girtz Industries, Inc. (133 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Girtz Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 2.4 9 0 0
2023 5.7 3.5 8 0 0
2022 4.1 3.4 6 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 7 0 0
2020 5.0 4.2 5 1 0
2019 8.3 5.3 11 0 0
2018 3.4 1.7 4 0 0
2017 3.1 2.3 4 0 0
2016 4.2 1.4 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · IN · Monticello

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 25 employers in Monticello, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shaffer Metal Fab, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IMEC 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACRO-FAB 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stoll Metalcraft Inc. 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Water Resource Recovery Facility 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & C Concrete Company INC 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE POLYWOOD Roxboro 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE MSI Express - Burnham 6750 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR JMC Monticello IN 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Beach LLC 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2771 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regal Power Transmission Solutions 244 FTE
NAT-TCR Pelican Wire 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Veranda Gardens 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Wire Products 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Marine Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magna Seating Auburn Hills 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE MANTECA 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apple Rehab Colchester 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters Recycling & Refuse Inc. 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.