Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors · Minnesota

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance

Minneapolis, MN · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance: 10.9 TCR = 288% of Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance safety composite

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2020→2024

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance injury rate improved

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance's TCR fell 10.7 from 16.2 in 2020 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=16.2 · 2021=11.1 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 288% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO RDF Builders Co
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RDF Builders Co (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gittleman Construction and Maintenance averages 10.9 TCR (288% of the Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance TCR series: 2020=16.2 · 2021=11.1 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Gittleman Construction and Maintenance falls in its industry

410 Residential construction, mult establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Residential construction, mult employers in Minnesota.

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance (61 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gittleman Construction and Maintenance
Gittleman Construction and Maintenance (61 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Gittleman Construction and Maintenance has fewer employees than the Residential construction, multifamily, g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 1.9 3 0 0
2021 11.1 9.3 6 0 0
2020 16.2 12.6 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · MN · Minneapolis

410 Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RDF Builders Co 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rose City Renovation 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR STS Remodeling Corp 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Contracting, Inc. 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE R and G Construction Co. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLK ELECTRIC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cresco Food Technologies 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albertville Truss Division 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Marion 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Grand Island 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Macedonia 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange Park 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yokohama Industries Americas Ohio 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jims Electric 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Courts of Geneva 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ervin Technologies 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.