Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science · Ohio

Givaudan Flavors - Edison

Name: Givaudan Flavors - Edison Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Cincinnati, OH · ~540 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 0.7
Avg TCR: 0.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Givaudan Flavors - Edison runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science workplace, earning a grade D.

Givaudan Flavors - Edison: 0.7 TCR = 130% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Givaudan Flavors - Edison safety composite

Givaudan Flavors - Edison scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Givaudan Flavors - Edison held a steady TCR band

Givaudan Flavors - Edison's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 130% of ind

DART 0.3 DART
RANK #3/6
PHOTO Vyriad
BOOK 2y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~540 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vyriad (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.7
Vyriad

0.6
Battelle Colum

0.6
Hopewell

0.6
Boston, MA Fac

0.6

What this shows Givaudan Flavors - Edison averages 0.7 TCR (130% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science BLS benchmark).

Givaudan Flavors - Edison TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Givaudan Flavors - Edison falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Biotechnology research and dev employers in Ohio.

Givaudan Flavors - Edison (540 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Givaudan Flavors - Edison has more employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.5	0.3	3	0	0
2017	0.8	0.2	4	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · OH · Cincinnati

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in food science employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Vyriad	ROCHESTER, MN	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Battelle Columbus Operations	COLUMBUS, OH	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hopewell	PENNINGTON, NJ	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Boston, MA Facility	BOSTON, MA	0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Arrow International, Inc.	CLEVELAND	540 FTE
STATE-SIZE	GOJO Industries, Inc. - Plaza	AKRON	540 FTE
STATE-SIZE	COH-ODFL	COLUMBUS	540 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wayne Dalton	MT. HOPE	541 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center	Cincinnati	17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cincinnati Operations	Cincinnati	10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Supply Chain : Evendale, OH	Cincinnati	7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Supply Chain Evendale OH	Cincinnati	6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR	Amcor Rigid Plastics Millville	Millville, NJ	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Little Creek Sanitarium	Knoxville, TN	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ardagh Metal Packaging USA - Inc. - Carnegie	Carnegie, PA	0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Palmdale	Alhambra, CA	0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Elekta Inc. Atlanta	Atlanta, GA	540 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Goodwill Staffing Solutions	Richmond, VA	540 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Spencer Gifts LLC	Egg Harbor Township, NJ	540 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Inpro Corporation - World Headquarters	Muskego, WI	540 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.