Gasoline stations with convenience stores · Minnesota

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store

Benson, MN · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store runs at 556% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Gasoline stations with convenience stores workplace, earning a grade F.

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store: 18.9 TCR = 556% of Gasoline stations with convenience stores BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store safety composite

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2023→2024

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store injury rate improved

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store's TCR fell 4.4 from 21.1 in 2023 to 16.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=21.1 · 2024=16.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 447110 · Benson, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 556% of ind

  • DART 16.7 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO Store 6805
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Store 6805 (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store averages 18.9 TCR (556% of the Gasoline stations with convenience stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store TCR series: 2023=21.1 · 2024=16.7 · BLS 3.4

Where Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store falls in its industry

451 Gasoline stations with conveni establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Gasoline stations with conveni employers in Minnesota.

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store (36 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store
Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store (36 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Glacial Plains Cooperative - Benson C-Store has more employees than the Gasoline stations with convenience store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.7 16.7 3 0 0
2023 21.1 5.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

447110 · MN · Benson

451 Gasoline stations with convenience stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Benson, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Store 6805 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 985 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodberry # 101 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 6806 20.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benson 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - Benson 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benson Public Schools 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swift County 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Estates of Shorewood 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Generations at Elmwood Park, LLC 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR InsulUSA LLC 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZCED 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stanbury Uniforms Milan 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friesland Dairy LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Smokies Lodge Vacation Property Owners Association Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA San Leandro 390 Doolittle Dr 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.