Continuing care retirement communities · Michigan

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC

Ann Arbor, MI · ~284 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC: 4.6 TCR = 120% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC safety composite

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC: 3.9 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2024

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC's TCR rose 1.3 from 3.9 in 2023 to 5.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ann Arbor, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #21/97
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Sout…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of South Holland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC averages 4.6 TCR (120% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC TCR series: 2023=3.9 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 97 Continuing care retirement com employers in Michigan.

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC (284 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC
Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC (284 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Glacier Hills Senior Living Community-THSC has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.5 9 0 0
2023 3.9 2.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Ann Arbor

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of South Holland 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARHC WHWCHPA01 TRS, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Kingwood - 220 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maravilla at the Domain 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dexter Fastener Technologies, Inc. 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE GHSP Hart 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welding 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM DETROIT 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR Nelson Company of Kentucky 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CFE Hartley 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #108 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Scott 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marietta 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE PEPCO- Benning Service Center 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 92 University of Rochester 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nevada Region 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.