Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Gladding Ridge

Lincoln, CA · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gladding Ridge runs at 651% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Gladding Ridge: 24.7 TCR = 651% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gladding Ridge safety composite

Gladding Ridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2021→2023

Gladding Ridge injury rate improved

Gladding Ridge's TCR fell 3.9 from 18.8 in 2021 to 14.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 40.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=18.8 · 2022=40.5 · 2023=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lincoln, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.7 · 651% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #616/635
  • PHOTO Atria Rancho Mirage
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atria Rancho Mirage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Gladding Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gladding Ridge averages 24.7 TCR (651% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gladding Ridge TCR series: 2021=18.8 · 2022=40.5 · 2023=14.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Gladding Ridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #616 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Gladding Ridge (41 employees, TCR 24.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Gladding Ridge
Gladding Ridge (41 employees, TCR 24.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gladding Ridge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.8 8.9 5 0 0
2022 40.5 40.5 3 11 0
2021 18.8 15.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Lincoln

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 43 employers in Lincoln, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atria Rancho Mirage 24.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Truewood West Covina 24.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kensington Fort Madison 24.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Oak Ridge 24.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thunder Valley Casino Resort 2,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Placer Unified School District 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBR Inc, dba SFBGC, dba RFC 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Mountain Solar 24.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 304 ABC Supply Co., Inc 24.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Estes Oil Burner Service Inc 24.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Manor Inc. Basic Care Facility 24.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 3415-3485 E Hamilton Ave 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gouldsboro, PA (Mazda) 108 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE ReChaco 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply- Cleveland 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.