Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and powdered, manufacturing · Idaho

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant

Gooding, ID · ~134 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and powdered, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant: 4.6 TCR = 140% of Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and powdered, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant safety composite

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant: 1.6 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2021

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant's TCR rose 6.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311514 · Gooding, ID ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 140% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO C.F BURGER CREAMERY …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C.F BURGER CREAMERY CO. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant averages 4.6 TCR (140% of the Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and powdered, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant falls in its industry

185 Whey, condensed, dried, evapor establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Whey, condensed, dried, evapor employers in Idaho.

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant (134 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant
Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant (134 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Glanbia Gooding Whey Plant has more employees than the Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.2 6.1 12 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 10 0 0
2018 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2017 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2016 1.6 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311514 · ID · Gooding

185 Whey, condensed, dried, evaporated, and powdered, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 11 employers in Gooding, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C.F BURGER CREAMERY CO. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresno Processing Plant 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fosston - J. RETTENMAIER USA LP 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Land O Lakes - Pine Island, MN 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2904-ASM-ID 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2587 LOWE S OF POCATELLO ID 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0030-0030-00126 FAC-00126-EMMETT-ID 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0030-0030-00177 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glanbia Gooding Cheese and Whey Plant 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glanbia Gooding Cheese Plant 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Canyon Medical Center 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glanbia Gooding Transportation 130 FTE
NAT-TCR Nye's Truck Repair & Wash, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Middletown General Government (City Hall) 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Milestone Senior Living Hillsboro 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Protolabs - Rapid 22 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Williams Construction 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Worley Warehousing, Inc. 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE TH Foods - Henderson 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Directional Drilling 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.