Electric power distribution systems · Kentucky

Glasgow Electric Plant Board

Glasgow, KY · ~47 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glasgow Electric Plant Board runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Glasgow Electric Plant Board: 2.9 TCR = 241% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glasgow Electric Plant Board safety composite

Glasgow Electric Plant Board scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Glasgow Electric Plant Board: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Glasgow Electric Plant Board's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Glasgow, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 241% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/56
  • PHOTO REVENUE SECURITY WAR…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: REVENUE SECURITY WAREHOUSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Glasgow Electric Plant Board in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glasgow Electric Plant Board averages 2.9 TCR (241% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glasgow Electric Plant Board TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Glasgow Electric Plant Board falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 56 Electric power distribution sy employers in Kentucky.

Glasgow Electric Plant Board (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Glasgow Electric Plant Board
Glasgow Electric Plant Board (47 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Glasgow Electric Plant Board has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 9.2 4.6 4 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · KY · Glasgow

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 66 employers in Glasgow, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR REVENUE SECURITY WAREHOUSE 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Service Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Maine Electric Cooperation, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Russellville 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cane Run 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miranda Construction, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gray Ohio Valley 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR TJ Samson Community Hospital 874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akebono Brake - Glasgow Plant 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications 572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akebono Brake, Glasgow Plant 477 FTE
NAT-TCR East Coast Communications LLC (Gorham, ME) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren County (BAMG) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GA100 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nitro 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE North State Mechanical, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASS Electric 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Valdosta 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norman Scott Co. dba In Tolerance 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.