Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield

Indianapolis, IN · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield runs at 411% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield: 15.6 TCR = 411% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield safety composite

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−37.0

2019→2024

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield injury rate improved

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield's TCR fell 37.0 from 44.6 in 2019 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 44.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=44.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 411% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #125/136
  • PHOTO Eastside Services, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastside Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glasswater Creek of Plainfield averages 15.6 TCR (411% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield TCR series: 2019=44.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Glasswater Creek of Plainfield falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield (48 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glasswater Creek of Plainfield
Glasswater Creek of Plainfield (48 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Glasswater Creek of Plainfield has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 3.8 4 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2019 44.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Indianapolis

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastside Services, LLC 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreens of Moorhead 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Temperance Lake Ridge 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Lancaster 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Police Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pure Green Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Rushville 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrison County REMC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR North Park FHC II 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Inn at Deerfield 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCarthy Court 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2232 - Natl City Pl Bonita 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Element Bozeman 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE RBC Bearings Southwest Products Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coppertail Brewing Co. LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Cocke County Utility District 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.