General warehousing and storage · Illinois

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp

Chicago, IL · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp: 10.1 TCR = 174% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp safety composite

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.4

2017→2023

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp injury rate improved

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp's TCR fell 17.4 from 17.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.1 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #513/551
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - SMF1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glen Ellyn Storage Corp averages 10.1 TCR (174% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp TCR series: 2017=17.4 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Glen Ellyn Storage Corp falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #513 safest of 551 General warehousing and storag employers in Illinois.

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp (26 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Glen Ellyn Storage Corp
Glen Ellyn Storage Corp (26 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Glen Ellyn Storage Corp has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.5 7.5 1 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2020 14.7 14.7 2 0 0
2019 17.9 17.9 3 0 0
2018 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2017 17.4 17.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IL · Chicago

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SMF1 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tellworks Logistics Corporate 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 7039 - WP Baldwin Ave 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 88104 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rock River - Corporate 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill 'N Dale Farm 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Generation 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Pumping Co Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Grosse Pointe 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewood Sioux Falls Senior Living 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Village Of Cleveland 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Halvor Logistics Services Superior 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Diamond Services, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Vancouver Ready Mix 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Les Schwab Tire Center-Salt Lake 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.