Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Glenn Hepfner, Inc.

Hartford, WI · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Glenn Hepfner, Inc.: 6.9 TCR = 208% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. safety composite

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Glenn Hepfner, Inc.: 4.8 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 78.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Glenn Hepfner, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.4 from 4.8 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 78.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Hartford, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 208% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #33/53
  • PHOTO CERIC FABRICATION CO…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CERIC FABRICATION CO INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glenn Hepfner, Inc. averages 6.9 TCR (208% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=78 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=11.8 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Glenn Hepfner, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 53 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Wisconsin.

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glenn Hepfner, Inc.
Glenn Hepfner, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Glenn Hepfner, Inc. has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 1.6 5 0 0
2023 11.8 4.4 8 0 0
2022 5.6 2.8 4 0 0
2021 8.4 4.2 6 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 78.0 26.0 9 0 0
2018 7.7 7.7 5 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · WI · Hartford

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 48 employers in Hartford, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CERIC FABRICATION CO INC. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Metal Products 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rangaire Mfg 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dimensional Metals Inc 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rock Prairie Dairy LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steigerwaldt Land Services, Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Power Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon Construction Group 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD WI 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR SIGNICAST LLC 738 FTE
CITY-NEAR Signicast - Hartford Manufacturing Complex 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broan-NuTone LLC 723 FTE
NAT-TCR Foodservice Atlanta - 0705 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent State Hotel and Conference Center 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Schenk Packing Co., Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiregrass Rehabilitation Center, Inc 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE James Boone Trucking Inc., dba Seminole Express 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Marino Retirement Community 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE EnCon Field Services LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&M Fleet Supply Park Rapids 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.