Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, refining and blending purchased oils · Texas

Global Alternative Fuels

El Paso, TX · ~214 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Alternative Fuels runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, refining and blending purchased oils workplace, earning a grade A.

Global Alternative Fuels: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, refining and blending purchased oils BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Alternative Fuels safety composite

Global Alternative Fuels scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Global Alternative Fuels: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2023

Global Alternative Fuels's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311225 · El Paso, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Quincy Refinery
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quincy Refinery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Global Alternative Fuels in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Alternative Fuels averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, refining and blending purchased oils BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Alternative Fuels TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Global Alternative Fuels falls in its industry

86 Grease, inedible, animal and v establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Grease, inedible, animal and v employers in Texas.

Global Alternative Fuels (214 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Alternative Fuels
Global Alternative Fuels (214 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Global Alternative Fuels has more employees than the Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.4 1.4 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311225 · TX · El Paso

86 Grease, inedible, animal and vegetable, refining and blending purchased oils employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quincy Refinery 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill, Des Moines 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAK USA Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cincinnati Crisco Plant 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oncor Transmission Operation Metro East 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Exxon-Beaumont 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Gulf 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE BComm Constructors Creekview 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Cross Implement Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR District 9 - Polk County 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems - OCSC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tecomet 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Givaudan- Ridgedale 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Charleston, SC 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prestage Farms of Oklahoma 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hibbett Wholesale, Inc 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.