Chairs (except wood), office-type, manufacturing · Michigan

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc.

Holland, MI · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chairs (except wood), office-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 154% of Chairs (except wood), office-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. safety composite

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc.: 7.6 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 7.6 in 2017 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337214 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 154% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/42
  • PHOTO The HON Company Prog…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The HON Company Progress Park (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (154% of the Chairs (except wood), office-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=8 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. falls in its industry

123 Chairs (except wood), office-t establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 42 Chairs (except wood), office-t employers in Michigan.

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc.
Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 127 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Global Concepts Enterprise, Inc. has fewer employees than the Chairs (except wood), office-type, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 0.0 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 5.3 3.5 3 0 0
2020 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2019 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2017 7.6 4.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337214 · MI · Holland

123 Chairs (except wood), office-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The HON Company Progress Park 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HighMark 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Affordable Interior Systems INC. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Steel 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Konos DBA Vande Bunte Eggs 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marquette Board of Light & Power 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton SC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VanDam & Krusinga Building and Restoration 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Aztec Landscaping, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pearce Foundry 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Melmat Inc 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swedish Covenant Hospital 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose of Appleton 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose of Rogers 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reuther Mold & Mfg. Co., Inc. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.