Recycling services for degreasing solvents (e.g., engine, machinery) manufacturing · Virginia

Global Refining Group, Inc.

Kenbridge, VA · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Global Refining Group, Inc. runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Recycling services for degreasing solvents (e.g., engine, machinery) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Global Refining Group, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Recycling services for degreasing solvents (e.g., engine, machinery) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Global Refining Group, Inc. safety composite

Global Refining Group, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Global Refining Group, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2023

Global Refining Group, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Kenbridge, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO Carbon Activated Cor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carbon Activated Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Global Refining Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Global Refining Group, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Recycling services for degreasing solvents (e.g., engine, machinery) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Global Refining Group, Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Global Refining Group, Inc. falls in its industry

485 Recycling services for degreas establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Recycling services for degreas employers in Virginia.

Global Refining Group, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Global Refining Group, Inc.
Global Refining Group, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Global Refining Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Recycling services for degreasing solven median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · VA · Kenbridge

485 Recycling services for degreasing solvents (e.g., engine, machinery) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 7 employers in Kenbridge, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carbon Activated Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNF 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLZ St. Clair 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Combe Products, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WARREN COUNTY POWER STATION 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dabney 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Pittsylvania 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southampton Power Station 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia Marble Manufacturers, Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Treatment Center 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pennington Seed Distribution - Kenbridge 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenbridge Construction Co., Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5093 Pittsburgh, PA 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4007 ESCONDIDO, CA 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stitches, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Border States Electric - Albertville 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sfc Koenig LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mariposa Landscapes Inc. - HQ 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard P. Fairfield Skowhegan 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lorentz Bruun Co 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.