Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Arkansas

Glory Transportation, Inc

Fayetteville, AR · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glory Transportation, Inc runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Glory Transportation, Inc: 0.4 TCR = 10% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glory Transportation, Inc safety composite

Glory Transportation, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Glory Transportation, Inc held a steady TCR band

Glory Transportation, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Fayetteville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/73
  • PHOTO ALVIN TERMINAL
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALVIN TERMINAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Glory Transportation, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glory Transportation, Inc averages 0.4 TCR (10% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Glory Transportation, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Glory Transportation, Inc falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 73 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Arkansas.

Glory Transportation, Inc (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Glory Transportation, Inc
Glory Transportation, Inc (28 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Glory Transportation, Inc has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · AR · Fayetteville

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 161 employers in Fayetteville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALVIN TERMINAL 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arlington, TX - E Pioneer Pkwy 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRIEN 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timber Logistics, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grannis/Broken Bow Growout 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Today's Power, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSC Arkansas 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR AR-Fayetteville 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Regional Med Center 2,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Regional Medical System 1,989 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fayetteville Complex 786 FTE
NAT-TCR Kato Engineering 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gunslinger Custom Paint 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrence Screw Products, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Track Generations, LLC. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lmmm Houston #56, Ltd 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Worcester 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home2 Suites Omaha West 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wallace Electrical Construction, Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.