Sport utility vehicles assembling on chassis of own manufacture · California

Glovis America Hu

Port Hueneme, CA · ~234 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Glovis America Hu runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sport utility vehicles assembling on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade F.

Glovis America Hu: 9.8 TCR = 298% of Sport utility vehicles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Glovis America Hu safety composite

Glovis America Hu scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2024

Glovis America Hu injury rate improved

Glovis America Hu's TCR fell 1.7 from 9.8 in 2021 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=9.8 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336110 · Port Hueneme, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 298% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Mobis U.S Alabama
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~234 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mobis U.S Alabama (2.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Glovis America Hu in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Glovis America Hu averages 9.8 TCR (298% of the Sport utility vehicles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Glovis America Hu TCR series: 2021=9.8 · 2022=12.6 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Glovis America Hu falls in its industry

13 Sport utility vehicles assembl establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Sport utility vehicles assembl employers in California.

Glovis America Hu (234 employees, TCR 9.8) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 567 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 11 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,00020,00025,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dakkota Integrated SystemsNA-US-TX-Austin-Giga TexasGLOVIS SHPorsche Cars North AmericaMOBIS North America, LLCWarren Truck Assembly PlantNA-US-CA-Fremont-44320-44350 Nobel DrGLOVIS AMERICA WPNA-US-CA-Fremont-47400 Kato RoadNA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont BlvdGlovis America Hu
Glovis America Hu (234 employees, TCR 9.8) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 567 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Glovis America Hu has fewer employees than the Sport utility vehicles assembling on cha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 6.0 19 0 0
2023 8.8 5.7 14 3 0
2022 12.6 7.6 20 0 0
2021 9.8 6.3 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336110 · CA · Port Hueneme

13 Sport utility vehicles assembling on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 21 employers in Port Hueneme, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mobis U.S Alabama 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOBIS North America, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Fremont-44320-44350 Nobel Dr 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edlyn Jauregui DBA Valdeja Ag. 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE PARADISE CHEVROLET CADILLAC 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE HealthSouth Tustin Rehabilitation Hospital 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2096 - Riverbank 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Hueneme 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Ro-Ro Stevedoring, LLC 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glovis America- VPC HU 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAC Foundries 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Cole Electric 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Father's Table - Lake Mary 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Filmtech Corporation 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5338 - Spokane 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building 2033 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DBA5 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Refinery Services, Inc 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd - Pennsylvania 234 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.