Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material · Texas

Goelzer Industries

Grand Prairie, TX · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Goelzer Industries runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material workplace, earning a grade B.

Goelzer Industries: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Goelzer Industries safety composite

Goelzer Industries scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Goelzer Industries held a steady TCR band

Goelzer Industries's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Grand Prairie, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Plant 05 - DM
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 05 - DM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Goelzer Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Goelzer Industries averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Goelzer Industries TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=3 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Goelzer Industries falls in its industry

122 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stat establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stat employers in Texas.

Goelzer Industries (75 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Goelzer Industries
Goelzer Industries (75 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Goelzer Industries has fewer employees than the Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.0 1 0 1
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 8.1 8.1 0 7 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · TX · Grand Prairie

122 Envelopes (i.e., mailing, stationery) made from any material employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 05 - DM 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cenveo - Williamsburg 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA CUSTOM PAD CORP 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WSEL - Walbridge 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crownover Farms dba Lone Star Family Farms 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 1 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice, TX 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE CACTUS OPERATING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Frankfort 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 05 Richmond 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR W.H.O. Manufacturing Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR IFB Solutions - Asheville 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barrington Pools, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitehouse 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoops Freightliner TC - Dayton 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0687 Arlington Heights 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.