Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing · Ohio

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights

Maple Heights, OH · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights safety composite

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights held a steady TCR band

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.7 in 2021 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.7 · 2022=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325611 · Maple Heights, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/42
  • PHOTO Church & Dwight Co.,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights TCR series: 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights falls in its industry

240 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 42 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid employers in Ohio.

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights (71 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights
GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights (71 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3

GOJO Industries, Inc. - Maple Heights has fewer employees than the Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325611 · OH · Maple Heights

240 Hand soaps (e.g., hard, liquid, soft) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 22 employers in Maple Heights, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Church & Dwight Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martinsburg 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProActive Solutions USA, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harvard Chemical, LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Grand Rapids Production GRA1 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rudolph Libbe Inc. - Ford Ohio Assembly Plant, Avon Lake 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE John G. Johnson Construction Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R Pipeline Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherwood Foods-Ohio 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Factory Direct 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Maple Heights Operating Co., LLC 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Sunrise 88 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Care Rome 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sasol Chemicals (USA) LLC, Oil City Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Essentra Components - Erie, PA 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 588 - Sunset Valley 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0005-0004-00839 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0017-0016-00013 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0030-0030-00020 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-ABS-0027-0026-01461 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.