Hotels, resort, without casinos · California

Golden Haven Hot Springs

Calistoga, CA · ~57 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden Haven Hot Springs runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels, resort, without casinos workplace, earning a grade D.

Golden Haven Hot Springs: 5.2 TCR = 173% of Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden Haven Hot Springs safety composite

Golden Haven Hot Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2024

Golden Haven Hot Springs injury rate improved

Golden Haven Hot Springs's TCR fell 3.5 from 6.5 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.5 · 2018=15.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Calistoga, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 173% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #320/1298
  • PHOTO Las Vegas Boulevard
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Las Vegas Boulevard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Golden Haven Hot Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden Haven Hot Springs averages 5.2 TCR (173% of the Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden Haven Hot Springs TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=15.9 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=8 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Golden Haven Hot Springs falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casino establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #320 safest of 1298 Hotels, resort, without casino employers in California.

Golden Haven Hot Springs (57 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden Haven Hot Springs
Golden Haven Hot Springs (57 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Golden Haven Hot Springs has more employees than the Hotels, resort, without casinos median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2018 15.9 15.9 6 0 0
2017 6.5 6.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Calistoga

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casinos employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 20 employers in Calistoga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas Boulevard 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency Cleveland at The Arcade 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Roof BWI - Linthicum Heights MD 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Centric Atlanta Buckhead 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solage 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Castello di Amorosa 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCHRAMSBERG VINEYARDS COMPANY 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR McBride & Shaw, Inc dba Cal Mart 78 FTE
NAT-TCR MJM Mechanical, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ South Home Care-Runnemede 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tiarco Chemical 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pearl Store 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Elementary School 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Simsbury Police 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimkor LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Circle Crossing Store & WHSE 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.