Fruit sorting, grading, and packing · California

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine

Madera, CA · ~69 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine runs at 287% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fruit sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade F.

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine: 12.9 TCR = 287% of Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine safety composite

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine: 7.9 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 25.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine's TCR rose 3.1 from 7.9 in 2018 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 287% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #220/236
  • PHOTO Eastside Packing, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastside Packing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine averages 12.9 TCR (287% of the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine TCR series: 2018=7.9 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=21.8 · 2022=25.5 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine falls in its industry

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 236 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa employers in California.

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine (69 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine
Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine (69 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine has fewer employees than the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 8.3 8 0 0
2023 6.1 6.1 5 0 0
2022 25.5 25.5 7 0 0
2021 21.8 17.5 8 2 0
2020 7.7 3.9 6 0 0
2019 10.2 5.7 9 0 0
2018 7.9 6.2 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Madera

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastside Packing, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Tree Farms - Traver Facility 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tomah Receiving 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Pak Avocado 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR Strasser Woodenworks 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Edwardsville Fwd WH 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1118 - NSM University Park 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Orca, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Stephen Elementary School 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elizabeth Green School 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarksville Growout 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grove City 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.