Concrete finishing machinery manufacturing · Iowa

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2

Ida Grove, IA · ~212 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 runs at 693% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete finishing machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2: 22.9 TCR = 693% of Concrete finishing machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 safety composite

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2: 21.2 → 23.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2's TCR rose 2.6 from 21.2 in 2016 to 23.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 26.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Ida Grove, IA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.9 · 693% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #25/25
  • PHOTO Blount - Prescott
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 414 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blount - Prescott (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 averages 22.9 TCR (693% of the Concrete finishing machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 TCR series: 2016=21.2 · 2017=21.5 · 2018=17.6 · 2019=25.6 · 2020=20 · 2021=25.9 · 2022=24 · 2023=26.3 · 2024=23.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 falls in its industry

400 Concrete finishing machinery m establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 25 Concrete finishing machinery m employers in Iowa.

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 (212 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gomaco Corporation Plant #2
Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 (212 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Gomaco Corporation Plant #2 has more employees than the Concrete finishing machinery manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.8 9.9 50 3 0
2023 26.3 16.1 55 2 0
2022 24.0 7.8 40 3 0
2021 25.9 8.6 45 0 0
2020 20.0 5.8 35 3 0
2019 25.6 8.8 61 3 0
2018 17.6 5.7 41 2 0
2017 21.5 7.6 44 4 0
2016 21.2 1.9 43 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · IA · Ida Grove

400 Concrete finishing machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 11 employers in Ida Grove, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blount - Prescott 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&D Fabricators Unity 22.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Badger Equipment Co 23.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Craig Manufacturing USA Inc. 21.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CJ Bio America 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Des Moines Water Works 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Gypsum Sperry 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexsteel Industries- Dubuque Operations 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Industries, Inc. 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ida County Community Hospital Inc 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gomaco Corporation Plant #1 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Godbersen Smith Const. Co 93 FTE
NAT-TCR South Sound Express Delivery, LLC 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 230428-Bal-Walbrook Sta 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Station 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinecrest Medical Care Facility 22.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vandergrift Operations 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0544 New York 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of San Antonio 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Support Office Fargo 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.