Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · California

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center

Stockton, CA · ~145 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center: 0.7 TCR = 11% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center: 0.9 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.71× in 2024

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.9 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 11% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #10/739
  • PHOTO Glenwood Healthcare …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glenwood Healthcare and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center averages 0.7 TCR (11% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2018=0.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=2 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 739 Convalescent homes or convales employers in California.

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center (145 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center
Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center (145 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Stockton

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glenwood Healthcare and Rehab 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wardell Gardens Rehab Center LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warren 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodside Manor 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LASAN - Solid Resources South Collection Division West Los Angeles District 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marina Del Rey Hotel 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandberg Furniture 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Winona Downtown 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Kenworth - Clinton Township 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle DC Fort Worth 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TMG Construction - Company Wide 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cassity Jones 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hudson 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Murray Resident Dining 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. D. Crumley & Company 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.